![]() Executive Orders 1283 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). See the Office of Management and Budget's memorandum, “Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of Janutitled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'” (February 2, 2017). This proposed rule is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because it is not significant under Executive Order 12866. These revisions also affect the grade requirements under the marketing order (Order) Oranges and Grapefruit Grown in Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas, 7 CFR part 906, issued under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 ( 7 U.S.C. Standards for Grades of Oranges (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona) from showing the acceptable number of allowable defective fruit in each grade to showing the percentage of defects permitted in each grade, revise minimum sample size to 25 fruit, update size classifications, remove reference to Temple orange in the orange standards for grade and more closely align terminology in both grade standards with Florida and California citrus standards. Standards for Grades of Grapefruit (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona) and the U.S. The proposed changes would convert the AQL tables in the U.S. End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Standards for Grades of Oranges (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona) are available on the AMS website at ![]() Standards for Grades of Grapefruit (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona) and U.S. Standards for Grades of Oranges (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona) may be viewed atĬopies of the current U.S. Banks at the address above, or by phone (540) 361–1120 fax (540) 361–1199 or, of the proposed U.S. Start Further Info FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments can also be viewed as submitted, including any personal information you provide, on the ![]() Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to the USDA, Specialty Crops Inspection Division, 100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101, Fredericksburg, VA 22406 fax: (540) 361–1199 or atĬomments should reference the date and page number of this issue of theĪnd will be made available for public inspection in the above office during regular business hours. DATES:Ĭomments must be submitted on or before May 11, 2020. The revision would convert the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) tables from showing the acceptable number of allowable defective fruit in each grade to showing the percentage of defects permitted in each grade revise the minimum sample size to 25 fruit update size classifications remove references to Temple oranges from the orange standards for grade and more closely align terminology in both grade standards with Florida and California citrus standards. Standards for Grades of Oranges (Texas and States other than Florida, California, and Arizona). The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposes to revise the U.S. Provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.Īgricultural Marketing Service, USDA. Rendition of the daily Federal Register on does not Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML Legal research should verify their results against an official edition of The official SGML-based PDF version on, those relying on it for The material on is accurately displayed, consistent with While every effort has been made to ensure that ![]() Regulatory information on with the objective ofĮstablishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.įor complete information about, and access to, our official publications Informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal This prototype edition of theĭaily Federal Register on will remain an unofficial Each document posted on the site includes a link to theĬorresponding official PDF file on. The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official It is not an official legal edition of the Federal This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the dailyįederal Register.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |